Side by sideSuburb comparison

The Troffs vs Botfields.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. The Troffs edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving The Troffs (889) sits above Botfields (869).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

The Troffs edges out on average school ICSEA (889 vs 869).

Common questionsThe Troffs vs Botfields

Common questions

Does The Troffs or Botfields have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), The Troffs scores 889 vs 869 in Botfields. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

The Troffs
Metric
Botfields

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$160/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$136/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
802
Population
494
50
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
889
Avg ICSEA
869

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).