Side by sideSuburb comparison

Thorndale vs Fletcher.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Fletcher scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Thorndale (951) sits above Fletcher (937).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Thorndale edges out on average school ICSEA (951 vs 937).

Common questionsThorndale vs Fletcher

Common questions

Does Thorndale or Fletcher have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Thorndale scores 951 vs 937 in Fletcher. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Thorndale or Fletcher?

Fletcher scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Thorndale
Metric
Fletcher

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$260/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$221/wk
76.0%
Owner occupied
17.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
134
Population
692
56
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
11
951
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).