Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tittybong vs Lalbert.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tittybong edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tittybong (992) sits above Lalbert (964).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tittybong edges out on average school ICSEA (992 vs 964).

Common questionsTittybong vs Lalbert

Common questions

Does Tittybong or Lalbert have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tittybong scores 992 vs 964 in Lalbert. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tittybong
Metric
Lalbert

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$168/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$168/wk
$143/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$168/wk
Owner occupied
96.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
3
Population
138
72
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
4
992
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).