Side by sideSuburb comparison

Toogoom vs Craignish.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Craignish edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Craignish (983) sits above Toogoom (967). Craignish skews owner-occupied (90%), Toogoom runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Craignish edges out on average school ICSEA (983 vs 967). Craignish also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsToogoom vs Craignish

Common questions

Does Toogoom or Craignish have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Craignish scores 983 vs 967 in Toogoom. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Toogoom
Metric
Craignish

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$345/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$383/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
90.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
5
2,596
Population
2,190
52
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
5
967
Avg ICSEA
983

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).