Tooronga vs Central Park

Central Park scores higher on walkability (58/100 vs 98/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tooronga (1148) sits above Central Park (1145).

Buying in Tooronga or Central Park?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Tooronga? The free selling guide

Tooronga and Central Park side by side

MeasureToorongaCentral Park
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA11481145
Lifestyle and people
Walk score5898
Transit score10040
Bike score100100
Climate
Annual rainfall668 mm668 mm
Mean max, January26.7°C26.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Tooronga edges out on average school ICSEA (1148 vs 1145).

Tooronga vs Central Park: common questions

Does Tooronga or Central Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tooronga scores 1148 vs 1145 in Central Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Tooronga or Central Park?

Central Park scores 98/100 on walkability vs 58/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.