Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tothill Belt vs Ngapala.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tothill Belt edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tothill Belt (976) sits above Ngapala (964). Ngapala skews owner-occupied (105%), Tothill Belt runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tothill Belt edges out on average school ICSEA (976 vs 964).

Common questionsTothill Belt vs Ngapala

Common questions

Does Tothill Belt or Ngapala have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tothill Belt scores 976 vs 964 in Ngapala. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tothill Belt
Metric
Ngapala

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
43.0%
Owner occupied
105.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
18
Population
61
49
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
5
976
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).