Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tumut vs Jones Bridge.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tumut edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Jones Bridge skews owner-occupied (75%), Tumut runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

The numbers behind the take

Tumut
Metric
Jones Bridge

Price & Market

$489,000
Median house
$360,000
Median unit
+4.2%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
28 days
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
32.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
15
Bike score
0
6,613
Population
15
42
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
5
933
Avg ICSEA
933

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).