Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tumut vs Bombowlee.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tumut edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bombowlee skews owner-occupied (92%), Tumut runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bombowlee has a heavier family-household mix (76% vs 66%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Tumut
Metric
Bombowlee

Price & Market

$489,000
Median house
$360,000
Median unit
+4.2%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
28 days
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
32.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
15
Bike score
0
6,613
Population
291
42
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
5
933
Avg ICSEA
933

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).