Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tungamull vs Mount Chalmers.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tungamull edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tungamull (948) sits above Mount Chalmers (939).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tungamull edges out on average school ICSEA (948 vs 939). Tungamull also has a higher family-household share (90% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTungamull vs Mount Chalmers

Common questions

Does Tungamull or Mount Chalmers have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tungamull scores 948 vs 939 in Mount Chalmers. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tungamull
Metric
Mount Chalmers

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$355/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
3.0%
Renter occupied
4.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
429
Population
226
43
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
948
Avg ICSEA
939

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).