Side by sideSuburb comparison

Uarbry vs Bungaba.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bungaba edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bungaba (937) sits above Uarbry (932). Bungaba skews owner-occupied (77%), Uarbry runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bungaba edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 932). Uarbry also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUarbry vs Bungaba

Common questions

Does Uarbry or Bungaba have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bungaba scores 937 vs 932 in Uarbry. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Uarbry
Metric
Bungaba

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$208/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
38
Population
88
56
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
8
932
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).