Side by sideSuburb comparison

Undercliffe vs Bardwell Valley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bardwell Valley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bardwell Valley (1072) sits above Undercliffe (1066). Undercliffe skews owner-occupied (109%), Bardwell Valley runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bardwell Valley edges out on average school ICSEA (1072 vs 1066).

Common questionsUndercliffe vs Bardwell Valley

Common questions

Does Undercliffe or Bardwell Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bardwell Valley scores 1072 vs 1066 in Undercliffe. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Undercliffe
Metric
Bardwell Valley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$550/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$480/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$550/wk
109.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
36
Transit score
0
Bike score
100
27
Population
2,344
59
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1066
Avg ICSEA
1072

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).