Side by sideSuburb comparison

Undercliffe vs Turrella.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Undercliffe edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Undercliffe (1066) sits above Turrella (1063). Undercliffe skews owner-occupied (109%), Turrella runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Undercliffe edges out on average school ICSEA (1066 vs 1063).

Common questionsUndercliffe vs Turrella

Common questions

Does Undercliffe or Turrella have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Undercliffe scores 1066 vs 1063 in Turrella. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Undercliffe
Metric
Turrella

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$550/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$520/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$520/wk
109.0%
Owner occupied
53.0%
Renter occupied
43.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
100
Transit score
20
Bike score
100
27
Population
2,673
59
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1066
Avg ICSEA
1063

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).