Side by sideSuburb comparison

Undercliffe vs Liston.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Liston edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Liston (966) sits above Undercliffe (953). Undercliffe skews owner-occupied (109%), Liston runs more rental-dense (86% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Liston edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 953). Undercliffe also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUndercliffe vs Liston

Common questions

Does Undercliffe or Liston have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Liston scores 966 vs 953 in Undercliffe. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Undercliffe
Metric
Liston

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$235/wk
109.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
27
Population
130
59
Median age
60

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
6
953
Avg ICSEA
966

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).