Upper Esk vs Mathinna

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mathinna (905) sits above Upper Esk (897). Mathinna skews owner-occupied (85%), Upper Esk runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

Buying in Upper Esk or Mathinna?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Upper Esk? The free selling guide

Upper Esk and Mathinna side by side

MeasureUpper EskMathinna
Renting
House rent$173/wk$173/wk
Unit rent$147/wk$150/wk
Owner occupied67.0%85.0%
Renter occupied–12.0%
Schools
Schools nearby42
Average ICSEA897905
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population25131
Median age6355
Climate
Annual rainfall1025 mm873 mm
Mean max, January22.0°C21.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mathinna edges out on average school ICSEA (905 vs 897). Upper Esk also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Upper Esk vs Mathinna: common questions

Does Upper Esk or Mathinna have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mathinna scores 905 vs 897 in Upper Esk. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.