Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Glastonbury vs Langshaw.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Langshaw edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Langshaw (973) sits above Upper Glastonbury (966). Langshaw skews owner-occupied (80%), Upper Glastonbury runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Langshaw edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 966). Upper Glastonbury also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUpper Glastonbury vs Langshaw

Common questions

Does Upper Glastonbury or Langshaw have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Langshaw scores 973 vs 966 in Upper Glastonbury. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Glastonbury
Metric
Langshaw

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$290/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
56
Population
167
47
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
20
966
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).