Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Stowport vs Natone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Natone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Natone (935) sits above Upper Stowport (899). Natone skews owner-occupied (94%), Upper Stowport runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Natone edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 899). Natone also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUpper Stowport vs Natone

Common questions

Does Upper Stowport or Natone have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Natone scores 935 vs 899 in Upper Stowport. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Stowport
Metric
Natone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$225/wk
76.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
99
Population
288
34
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
20
899
Avg ICSEA
935

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).