Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Stowport vs Ridgley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ridgley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ridgley (911) sits above Upper Stowport (899). Ridgley skews owner-occupied (86%), Upper Stowport runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ridgley edges out on average school ICSEA (911 vs 899). Ridgley also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUpper Stowport vs Ridgley

Common questions

Does Upper Stowport or Ridgley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ridgley scores 911 vs 899 in Upper Stowport. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Stowport
Metric
Ridgley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
76.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
99
Population
645
34
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
9
899
Avg ICSEA
911

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).