Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Swan vs Baskerville.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Upper Swan edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Swan (1010) sits above Baskerville (1009). Upper Swan skews owner-occupied (88%), Baskerville runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Upper Swan edges out on average school ICSEA (1010 vs 1009).

Common questionsUpper Swan vs Baskerville

Common questions

Does Upper Swan or Baskerville have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Swan scores 1010 vs 1009 in Baskerville. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Swan
Metric
Baskerville

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$365/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$353/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
20
Bike score
0
549
Population
302
52
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1010
Avg ICSEA
1009

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).