Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Turon vs Running Stream.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Upper Turon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Turon (947) sits above Running Stream (911).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Upper Turon edges out on average school ICSEA (947 vs 911).

Common questionsUpper Turon vs Running Stream

Common questions

Does Upper Turon or Running Stream have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Turon scores 947 vs 911 in Running Stream. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Turon
Metric
Running Stream

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$272/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$215/wk
Owner occupied
65.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
13
Population
120
58
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
11
947
Avg ICSEA
911

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).