Side by sideSuburb comparison

Urangan vs Torquay.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Torquay edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Torquay scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 34/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsUrangan vs Torquay

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Urangan or Torquay?

Torquay scores 34/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Urangan
Metric
Torquay

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$565/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$600/wk
$520/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
30.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
34
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
10,988
Population
66,789
55
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
970
Avg ICSEA
970

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).