Side by sideSuburb comparison

Urraween vs Pialba.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pialba edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Pialba scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 32/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Urraween skews owner-occupied (71%), Pialba runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Urraween has a heavier family-household mix (71% vs 59%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsUrraween vs Pialba

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Urraween or Pialba?

Pialba scores 32/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Urraween
Metric
Pialba

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$650/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$680/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$460/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
54.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
41.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
32
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
7,951
Population
4,151
55
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
970
Avg ICSEA
970

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).