Walkerston vs Greenmount

Walkerston scores higher on walkability (8/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Greenmount (975) sits above Walkerston (973).

Buying in Walkerston or Greenmount?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Walkerston? The free selling guide

Walkerston and Greenmount side by side

MeasureWalkerstonGreenmount
Renting
Owner occupied74.0%–
Renter occupied23.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby820
Average ICSEA973975
Lifestyle and people
Walk score80
Transit score00
Bike score350
Population3,615–
Median age35–
Climate
Annual rainfall1580 mm1515 mm
Mean max, January31.1°C31.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Greenmount edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 973).

Walkerston vs Greenmount: common questions

Does Walkerston or Greenmount have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Greenmount scores 975 vs 973 in Walkerston. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Walkerston or Greenmount?

Walkerston scores 8/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.