Side by sideSuburb comparison

Walloway vs Morchard.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Morchard edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Morchard (989) sits above Walloway (981). Morchard skews owner-occupied (133%), Walloway runs more rental-dense (100% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Morchard edges out on average school ICSEA (989 vs 981). Morchard also has a higher family-household share (133% vs 100%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWalloway vs Morchard

Common questions

Does Walloway or Morchard have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Morchard scores 989 vs 981 in Walloway. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Walloway
Metric
Morchard

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$128/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
133.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
8
Population
19
49
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
4
981
Avg ICSEA
989

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).