Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wappilka vs New Residence.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. New Residence edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving New Residence (959) sits above Wappilka (952).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

New Residence edges out on average school ICSEA (959 vs 952). New Residence also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWappilka vs New Residence

Common questions

Does Wappilka or New Residence have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), New Residence scores 959 vs 952 in Wappilka. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wappilka
Metric
New Residence

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$190/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
37.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
17
Population
95
29
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
10
952
Avg ICSEA
959

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).