Side by sideSuburb comparison

Whyalla Stuart vs Whyalla Jenkins.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Whyalla Stuart edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Whyalla Stuart scores higher on walkability (44/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Whyalla Jenkins skews owner-occupied (58%), Whyalla Stuart runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Whyalla Jenkins has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 56%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsWhyalla Stuart vs Whyalla Jenkins

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Whyalla Stuart or Whyalla Jenkins?

Whyalla Stuart scores 44/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Whyalla Stuart
Metric
Whyalla Jenkins

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$427/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
47.0%
Owner occupied
58.0%
49.0%
Renter occupied
41.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

44
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
60
Bike score
0
6,476
Population
1,961
41
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
11
901
Avg ICSEA
901

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).