Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wights Mountain vs Camp Mountain.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Camp Mountain edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Camp Mountain (1087) sits above Wights Mountain (1083).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Camp Mountain edges out on average school ICSEA (1087 vs 1083).

Common questionsWights Mountain vs Camp Mountain

Common questions

Does Wights Mountain or Camp Mountain have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Camp Mountain scores 1087 vs 1083 in Wights Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wights Mountain
Metric
Camp Mountain

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$488/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$488/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$390/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
15
Bike score
0
767
Population
1,447
48
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
19
1083
Avg ICSEA
1087

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).