Side by sideSuburb comparison

Willoughby vs Ironstone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ironstone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ironstone (987) sits above Willoughby (975).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ironstone edges out on average school ICSEA (987 vs 975). Willoughby also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWilloughby vs Ironstone

Common questions

Does Willoughby or Ironstone have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ironstone scores 987 vs 975 in Willoughby. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Willoughby
Metric
Ironstone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$187/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
Owner occupied
33.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
11
Population
20
54
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
2
975
Avg ICSEA
987

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).