Side by sideSuburb comparison

Windermere vs Kalkie.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Kalkie scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Windermere (959) sits above Kalkie (956).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Windermere edges out on average school ICSEA (959 vs 956).

Common questionsWindermere vs Kalkie

Common questions

Does Windermere or Kalkie have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Windermere scores 959 vs 956 in Kalkie. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Windermere or Kalkie?

Kalkie scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Windermere
Metric
Kalkie

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$285/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$650/wk
$242/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$310/wk
Owner occupied
73.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
14
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
40
84,718
Population
2,968
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
959
Avg ICSEA
956

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).