Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wollert vs Woodstock.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $705,000 and $627,000. Woodstock edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Woodstock (median $627,000) is roughly 12% cheaper to buy into than Wollert ($705,000).

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Woodstock (1042) sits above Wollert (1025).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Woodstock is the lower entry point at $627,000 median, 12% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Woodstock edges out on average school ICSEA (1042 vs 1025).

Common questionsWollert vs Woodstock

Common questions

Is Wollert or Woodstock cheaper to buy in?

Woodstock has the lower median house price at $627,000, roughly 12% below Wollert ($705,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Does Wollert or Woodstock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Woodstock scores 1042 vs 1025 in Wollert. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wollert
Metric
Woodstock

Price & Market

$705,000
Median house
$627,000
$510,000
Median unit
$554,400
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
Rent (unit / wk)
74.0%
Owner occupied
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
0
24,407
Population
150
30
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1025
Avg ICSEA
1042

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).