Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wolvi vs Coondoo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coondoo edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coondoo (986) sits above Wolvi (964). Wolvi skews owner-occupied (82%), Coondoo runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coondoo edges out on average school ICSEA (986 vs 964).

Common questionsWolvi vs Coondoo

Common questions

Does Wolvi or Coondoo have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coondoo scores 986 vs 964 in Wolvi. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wolvi
Metric
Coondoo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$270/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$365/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
521
Population
43
48
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
8
964
Avg ICSEA
986

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).