Side by sideSuburb comparison

Womarden vs Koolanooka.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Womarden edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Womarden (909) sits above Koolanooka (902). Koolanooka skews owner-occupied (150%), Womarden runs more rental-dense (107% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Womarden edges out on average school ICSEA (909 vs 902). Koolanooka also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWomarden vs Koolanooka

Common questions

Does Womarden or Koolanooka have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Womarden scores 909 vs 902 in Koolanooka. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Womarden
Metric
Koolanooka

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$120/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$190/wk
$143/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$162/wk
107.0%
Owner occupied
150.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied
75.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
32
Population
22
42
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
2
909
Avg ICSEA
902

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).