Woodleigh vs Pata

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pata (995) sits above Woodleigh (939). Pata skews owner-occupied (86%), Woodleigh runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

Buying in Woodleigh or Pata?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Woodleigh? The free selling guide

Woodleigh and Pata side by side

MeasureWoodleighPata
Renting
Owner occupied50.0%86.0%
Schools
Schools nearby24
Average ICSEA939995
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population7381
Median age3054
Climate
Annual rainfall269 mm269 mm
Mean max, January32.6°C32.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Pata edges out on average school ICSEA (995 vs 939). Pata also has a higher family-household share (79% vs 54%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Woodleigh vs Pata: common questions

Does Woodleigh or Pata have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pata scores 995 vs 939 in Woodleigh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.