Side by sideSuburb comparison

Woolundunga vs Stirling North.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Woolundunga edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Woolundunga (890) sits above Stirling North (845). Stirling North skews owner-occupied (82%), Woolundunga runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Woolundunga edges out on average school ICSEA (890 vs 845). Woolundunga also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWoolundunga vs Stirling North

Common questions

Does Woolundunga or Stirling North have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Woolundunga scores 890 vs 845 in Stirling North. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Woolundunga
Metric
Stirling North

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$390/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
30
Population
2,793
44
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
10
890
Avg ICSEA
845

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).