Side by sideSuburb comparison

Woopen Creek vs Nerada.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Nerada edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Nerada (903) sits above Woopen Creek (901). Nerada skews owner-occupied (100%), Woopen Creek runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Nerada edges out on average school ICSEA (903 vs 901).

Common questionsWoopen Creek vs Nerada

Common questions

Does Woopen Creek or Nerada have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Nerada scores 903 vs 901 in Woopen Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Woopen Creek
Metric
Nerada

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$170/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$175/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
135
Population
88
57
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
14
901
Avg ICSEA
903

Climate

2065 mm
Annual rainfall
2065 mm
31.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.5°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).