Side by sideSuburb comparison

Worlds End vs Bright.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bright edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bright (964) sits above Worlds End (956).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bright edges out on average school ICSEA (964 vs 956). Worlds End also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 45%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWorlds End vs Bright

Common questions

Does Worlds End or Bright have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bright scores 964 vs 956 in Worlds End. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Worlds End
Metric
Bright

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
Owner occupied
118.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
14
Population
18
34
Median age
27

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
6
956
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).