Side by sideSuburb comparison

Yahl vs O B Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. O B Flat edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

O B Flat scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving O B Flat (964) sits above Yahl (962).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

O B Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (964 vs 962).

Common questionsYahl vs O B Flat

Common questions

Does Yahl or O B Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), O B Flat scores 964 vs 962 in Yahl. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Yahl or O B Flat?

O B Flat scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Yahl
Metric
O B Flat

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$510/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$225/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$187/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
6.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
817
Population
10,151
43
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
12
962
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).