Side by sideSuburb comparison

Yamala vs Emerald.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Emerald scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Yamala (972) sits above Emerald (959).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Yamala edges out on average school ICSEA (972 vs 959).

Common questionsYamala vs Emerald

Common questions

Does Yamala or Emerald have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Yamala scores 972 vs 959 in Emerald. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Yamala or Emerald?

Emerald scores 100/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Yamala
Metric
Emerald

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$560/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
10
0
Bike score
100
15,031
Population
15,031
32
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
10
972
Avg ICSEA
959

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).