Side by sideSuburb comparison

Yeppoon vs Taranganba.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Yeppoon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Yeppoon scores higher on walkability (22/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Taranganba skews owner-occupied (70%), Yeppoon runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Taranganba has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsYeppoon vs Taranganba

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Yeppoon or Taranganba?

Yeppoon scores 22/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Yeppoon
Metric
Taranganba

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$620/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$500/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
33.0%
Renter occupied
28.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

22
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
7,037
Population
2,275
47
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
993
Avg ICSEA
993

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).