Side by sideSuburb comparison

Yetholme vs Gemalla.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gemalla edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gemalla (972) sits above Yetholme (967). Gemalla skews owner-occupied (133%), Yetholme runs more rental-dense (89% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gemalla edges out on average school ICSEA (972 vs 967). Gemalla also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsYetholme vs Gemalla

Common questions

Does Yetholme or Gemalla have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gemalla scores 972 vs 967 in Yetholme. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Yetholme
Metric
Gemalla

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$365/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
133.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
241
Population
24
48
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
20
967
Avg ICSEA
972

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).