Yornaning vs Cuballing

Cuballing scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cuballing skews owner-occupied (86%), Yornaning runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

Buying in Yornaning or Cuballing?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Yornaning? The free selling guide

Yornaning and Cuballing side by side

MeasureYornaningCuballing
Renting
House rent$216/wk$216/wk
Unit rent$165/wk$280/wk
Owner occupied57.0%86.0%
Renter occupied43.0%11.0%
Schools
Schools nearby75
Average ICSEA946946
Lifestyle and people
Walk score06
Transit score00
Bike score250
Population49456
Median age4552
Climate
Annual rainfall422 mm429 mm
Mean max, January31.7°C31.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cuballing has a heavier family-household mix (73% vs 57%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Yornaning vs Cuballing: common questions

Which is more walkable, Yornaning or Cuballing?

Cuballing scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.