Side by sideSuburb comparison

Zara vs Chillingham.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Zara edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Zara (988) sits above Chillingham (980). Chillingham skews owner-occupied (92%), Zara runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Zara edges out on average school ICSEA (988 vs 980).

Common questionsZara vs Chillingham

Common questions

Does Zara or Chillingham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Zara scores 988 vs 980 in Chillingham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Zara
Metric
Chillingham

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$440/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$285/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
87
Population
228
45
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
9
988
Avg ICSEA
980

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).