Side by sideSuburb comparison

Alma Park vs Ryan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Alma Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Alma Park (972) sits above Ryan (966). Alma Park skews owner-occupied (108%), Ryan runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Alma Park edges out on average school ICSEA (972 vs 966). Alma Park also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsAlma Park vs Ryan

Common questions

Does Alma Park or Ryan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Alma Park scores 972 vs 966 in Ryan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Alma Park
Metric
Ryan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$69/wk
108.0%
Owner occupied
65.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
58
Population
62
50
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
6
972
Avg ICSEA
966

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).