Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bangholme vs Bonbeach.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bonbeach edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bonbeach (1067) sits above Bangholme (1055). Bangholme skews owner-occupied (83%), Bonbeach runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bonbeach edges out on average school ICSEA (1067 vs 1055). Bonbeach also has a higher family-household share (64% vs 42%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBangholme vs Bonbeach

Common questions

Does Bangholme or Bonbeach have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bonbeach scores 1067 vs 1055 in Bangholme. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bangholme
Metric
Bonbeach

Price & Market

Median house
$1,107,500
Median unit
$702,500
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$321/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$396/wk
$176/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$391/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
50
Bike score
749
Population
6,855
71
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1055
Avg ICSEA
1067

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).