Bannockburn vs Luscombe

Bannockburn scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Luscombe (989) sits above Bannockburn (984).

Buying in Bannockburn or Luscombe?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Bannockburn? The free selling guide

Bannockburn and Luscombe side by side

MeasureBannockburnLuscombe
Renting
Owner occupied–95.0%
Renter occupied–8.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA984989
Lifestyle and people
Walk score120
Transit score00
Bike score200
Population–265
Median age–47
Climate
Annual rainfall1028 mm1001 mm
Mean max, January29.9°C29.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Luscombe edges out on average school ICSEA (989 vs 984).

Bannockburn vs Luscombe: common questions

Does Bannockburn or Luscombe have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Luscombe scores 989 vs 984 in Bannockburn. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Bannockburn or Luscombe?

Bannockburn scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.