Side by sideSuburb comparison

Barren Grounds vs Foxground.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Foxground edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Foxground (1068) sits above Barren Grounds (1030).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Foxground edges out on average school ICSEA (1068 vs 1030).

Common questionsBarren Grounds vs Foxground

Common questions

Does Barren Grounds or Foxground have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Foxground scores 1068 vs 1030 in Barren Grounds. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Barren Grounds
Metric
Foxground

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$500/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$570/wk
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16,724
Population
164
47
Median age
60

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
5
1030
Avg ICSEA
1068

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).