Bayles vs Pakenham South
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pakenham South (999) sits above Bayles (981). Bayles skews owner-occupied (82%), Pakenham South runs more rental-dense (70% owner).
Buying in Bayles or Pakenham South?
Selling in Bayles? The free selling guide
Bayles and Pakenham South side by side
| Measure | Bayles | Pakenham South |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 82.0% | 70.0% |
| Renter occupied | 10.0% | 24.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 5 | 20 |
| Average ICSEA | 981 | 999 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 5 |
| Population | 445 | 229 |
| Median age | 42 | 46 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 806 mm | 795 mm |
| Mean max, January | 26.0°C | 26.2°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Pakenham South edges out on average school ICSEA (999 vs 981).
Bayles vs Pakenham South: common questions
Does Bayles or Pakenham South have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pakenham South scores 999 vs 981 in Bayles. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Bayles with
Choosing between Bayles and Pakenham South?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.