Side by sideSuburb comparison

Beaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham Upper.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Beaconsfield Upper edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beaconsfield Upper (1044) sits above Pakenham Upper (1013).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Beaconsfield Upper edges out on average school ICSEA (1044 vs 1013).

Common questionsBeaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham Upper

Common questions

Does Beaconsfield Upper or Pakenham Upper have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beaconsfield Upper scores 1044 vs 1013 in Pakenham Upper. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Beaconsfield Upper
Metric
Pakenham Upper

Price & Market

$1,215,600
Median house
$353,520
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$351/wk
$368/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied
3.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
2,997
Population
1,196
42
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1044
Avg ICSEA
1013

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).