Side by sideSuburb comparison

Beechmont vs Flying Fox.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Beechmont edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beechmont (1039) sits above Flying Fox (1034).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Beechmont edges out on average school ICSEA (1039 vs 1034).

Common questionsBeechmont vs Flying Fox

Common questions

Does Beechmont or Flying Fox have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beechmont scores 1039 vs 1034 in Flying Fox. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Beechmont
Metric
Flying Fox

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$430/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$340/wk
90.0%
Owner occupied
9.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
848
Population
3,895
51
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1039
Avg ICSEA
1034

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).