Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bejoording vs Mumberkine.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bejoording edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bejoording (964) sits above Mumberkine (917). Bejoording skews owner-occupied (91%), Mumberkine runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bejoording edges out on average school ICSEA (964 vs 917). Bejoording also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBejoording vs Mumberkine

Common questions

Does Bejoording or Mumberkine have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bejoording scores 964 vs 917 in Mumberkine. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bejoording
Metric
Mumberkine

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
30.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
157
Population
57
45
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
10
964
Avg ICSEA
917

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).