Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bellamack vs Mitchell.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bellamack edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bellamack scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsBellamack vs Mitchell

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Bellamack or Mitchell?

Bellamack scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Bellamack
Metric
Mitchell

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$420/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$420/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$357/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
58.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

12
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
75
Bike score
55
2,423
Population
18,727
29
Median age
30

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
16
943
Avg ICSEA
943

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).